<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Nonprofit Banker &#187; Accountant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nonprofitbanker.com/tag/accountant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nonprofitbanker.com</link>
	<description>Banking and Beyond for Israel&#039;s Global Nonprofit Sector</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2014 05:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Avoiding &#8220;Fashlas&#8221; by Your Accountant</title>
		<link>http://nonprofitbanker.com/banking/avoiding-fashlas-by-your-accountant/</link>
		<comments>http://nonprofitbanker.com/banking/avoiding-fashlas-by-your-accountant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shuey Fogel]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accountant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amutah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookkeeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cashflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nonprofitbanker.com/?p=2802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word fashla is Hebrew colloquial for "screw-up". And yes, even your accountant, an Israeli charity's best friend, can make a few.

As a banker I see this particular slip-up more often than you think. Here are two ways to avoid your accountant inadvertently putting your organization in the red.  <p class="more-link-p"><a class="more-link" href="http://nonprofitbanker.com/banking/avoiding-fashlas-by-your-accountant/">Read more &#8594;</a></p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="pf-content"><p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danmoyle/5634567317/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3091" style="margin-left: 8px;" title="&quot;Empty Pockets&quot; by DanielMoyle (Flickr)" src="http://nonprofitbanker.com/wp-content/uploads/EmptyPocket-e1345108937231.jpg" alt="&quot;Empty Pockets&quot; by DanielMoyle (Flickr)" width="189" height="126" /></a>The word <em>fashla</em> is Hebrew colloquial for &#8220;screw-up&#8221;. And yes, even your accountant, an Israeli charity&#8217;s best friend, can make a few.</p>
<p>As a banker I see this particular slip-up more often than you think. Here are two ways to avoid your accountant inadvertently putting your organization&#8217;s bank account in the red.  <span id="more-2802"></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #007d00;"><strong><br />
PRELUDE</strong></span></p>
<p>In Israel, the accountant fulfills a crucial role for the <em>amutah</em> [Israeli Charity].</p>
<p>It is your accountant who will point out pitfalls to avoid and best-practices to follow. Assuming you follow your accountant&#8217;s advice, s/he will defend your tax-deductible status from less-than-cooperative regulatory bodies. Additionally, many accounting firms also offer bookkeeping services, making them a one-stop-shop for all a charity&#8217;s needs.</p>
<p>For these reasons and more, many nonprofits in Israel will leave with their accountant a signed check book so that the s/he can pay relevant bills without having to &#8220;bother&#8221; the nonprofit.</p>
<p>While efficient in theory &#8212; and assuming that an organization is aware of the risks and has obtained the agreement of all relevant stakeholders &#8212; there needs to be some ground rules before deciding to put this plan into action.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #007d00;"><br />
1. NOTIFY THE NONPROFIT BEFORE ANY PAYMENT</span></strong></p>
<p>Generally, the accountant&#8217;s checkbook is used for payments to <em>Mas Hachnasah</em> [Tax Authority] and/or <em>Bituach Leumi</em> [National Insurance - think Social Security], payments that potentially differ each month and whose computations are done by the accountant. The idea is to take out the middle man &#8212; the organization &#8212; and just have the accountant pay the relevant government bodies directly. Like I said, efficient.</p>
<p>It can happen that a nonprofit will forget to incorporate the accountant&#8217;s checkbook into its cashflow management. The age old saying of &#8220;Out of sight, out of mind&#8221; comes to mind (no pun intended) when thinking of this scenario.</p>
<p>Letting an organization know of any upcoming payments can avoid these &#8220;unexpected&#8221; withdrawals. Government payments, in particular, are generally not a last-minute item and can be planned in advance. It probably isn&#8217;t a bad idea to have a working agreement regarding minimum &#8220;notify&#8221; times.</p>
<p><span style="color: #007d00;"><strong><br />
2. TO THINE OWN SELF BE TRUE</strong></span></p>
<p>The other instance where accountants tend to write their own check is when they&#8230;[wait for it]&#8230;pay themselves.</p>
<p>Yep.</p>
<p>Similar to the government agencies above, monthly payments to the accountant are not always the same. Additionally, there is the added benefit of convenience for the accountant; after all, the checks are already signed and sitting in his office.</p>
<p>This scenario mimics the first in terms of &#8220;Out of sight, out of mind&#8221; but has the additional element of Conflict of Interest.</p>
<p>While I wouldn&#8217;t say that an accountant who writes him or herself a check without first notifying the client has immediately crossed any red lines, it might be indicative that this s/he isn&#8217;t a stickler for details &#8212; and a propensity for details is severely required by an accountant.</p>
<p>In addition to a general Conflict of Interest policy for the nonprofit, there should be an prearranged agreement of which beneficiaries will be paid from the accountant&#8217;s checkbook and which will be paid from the organization&#8217;s checkbook.</p>
<p><span style="color: #007d00;"><strong><br />
CONCLUSION</strong></span></p>
<p>The ultimate fiscal responsibility lies with the organization. At the same time, accountants are too important to Israeli charities for there to be doubts or misgivings.</p>
<p>The relationship between accountant/bookkeeper and nonprofit organization is as much about expertise as it is about personalities. If these <em>fashlas</em> happen more than just a few times it might be a sign that this accountant is not a good match for the organization (or vice versa).</p>
<p><em>Tizku Lemitzvot</em>,</p>
<p>Shuey</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Disclaimer:  </strong>This blog houses my personal opinions and is for informational purposes only — not advice. As charity laws can be quite complex and ever-changing, please refer all questions to qualified and licensed professionals. Read the <a href="http://nonprofitbanker.wordpress.com/disclaimer/" target="_blank">full disclaimer</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Photo Credit:</strong> “<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/danmoyle/5634567317/" target="_blank">Empty Pockets</a>” by Dan Moyle (Flickr)</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nonprofitbanker.com/banking/avoiding-fashlas-by-your-accountant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
