Two recent articles by Stephen Donshik have crystallized why board members need to stay objective.

1. Bylaws sometimes allow for board members to receive remuneration for attending meetings.  Payments of any amount, however, erase the status of “volunteer,” essentially, destroying what the organization was hoping to achieve when it recruited this individual.  
2. Additionally, a board member can potentially win contracts from the organization in which he serves. However, this person is then tasked with critiquing his own work, a near-impossibility.

Even with the best of intentions, losing objectivity weakens the board’s ability to accomplish its primary task of governance.

Tizku Lemitzvot,

Shuey

EXPRESSDEPOSIT’s are a new feature to the site, offering 100 WORDS OR LESS on funding, finance, trends, and best practices relating to Israel’s global nonprofit sector.

Photo courtesy of Huskyte77 (Flickr)

Here are links to the articles I’ve reviewed and posted to Twitter recently.  This week’s topics include: Jewish & Israel Sectors • NP Strategy • Funding, Budgeting & Impact • Philanthropy • Internet & Social Media • Boards • Op-Eds

As always, you can stay up-to-date with these articles and more by following me on Twitter or subscribing to receive The Nonprofit Banker by email.

Tizku Lemitzvot,

Shuey
@nonprofitbanker

JEWISH & ISRAEL SECTORS

NonProfitBanker: New post >> Future Trends in Israel’s Nonprofit Sector: A Review of the Top Headlines in 2012 ow.ly/1RCQF9

NonProfitBanker: The authors of this eJPhil post on Jewish innovation shouldn’t worry too much about funding ow.ly/1RX3Ao I’m the 3rd comment

NP STRATEGY

Exciting. NAFund is using profitability-impact matrix to improve upon their already gr8 work ow.ly/1RQpQz // can you use it too?

5 Things That an Eventful 2012 Taught Charities ow.ly/1RI8eo on Philanthropy via GTak

10 resolutions to bring your Social Venture to success ow.ly/1RZWcm via GTak

FUNDING, BUDGETING & IMPACT

Why Impact Sourcing is easier to implement than Impact Investing (Yes, there is a dif) ow.ly/hnBG4 by DaveBatstone on SSIReview

Bold statement >> Social Impact Investing Will Be the New Venture Capital ow.ly/1RXL4C on HarvardBiz via GTak

You realize how hard measuring impact is only after this article ow.ly/1RS9WT by andrew_zolli on SSIReview

The value of strategic financial leadership ow.ly/1RSGN9 on NAFund // sounds important enough that I might read it again

The funder’s mantra >> Those affected by a problem have to help define the solution ow.ly/1RVECZ from p2173

PHILANTHROPY

VERY important >> Philanthropy: Wealthy Young Donors Push Charities to Show Results ow.ly/1RFaeK via GailPerrync

Strategic philanthropy has a new name – Entrepreneurial Philanthropy – & 6 clear steps ow.ly/1RRrEX on SSIReview

A Case Study in Getting Nonprofit Fundraising Right ow.ly/1RSvbJ from nedgington

8 questions to make your philanthropy be more strategic ow.ly/1RHqwx via eJPhil

SOCIAL MEDIA & INTERNET

Thanx Fundraisinisfun I’m a Google+ Communities believer…almost. He makes a great argument ow.ly/1RTVD8

Can’t argue w/ the numbers >> 5 Reasons Why a Nonprofit Should Prioritize the Mobile Web NOW ow.ly/hqK6h by NonprofitOrgs

BOARDS

I’ve seen these ex w/ more than a few of my clients » Ethical Dilemmas connected w/ Nonprofit Boards ow.ly/1RX4dm on eJPhil

What 2 talk about at nonprofit board meetings? (hint: it should only be 1 thing) ow.ly/1S5SEP on npquarterly via GTak

OP-EDs

Liberating 990 Data ow.ly/1RSxrL on p2173 // amen to that!

Can the Circular Economy save our planet? (& produce nice revenues too?) blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/01/is_… on HarvardBiz via katyaN4G

]]> http://nonprofitbanker.com/weekly-roundup/weekly-roundup-february-10/feed/ 0 http://nonprofitbanker.com/regulations/israel-regulations/trends-to-look-for-in-2013-a-review-of-the-top-stories-that-affected-israels-nonprofit-sector/ http://nonprofitbanker.com/regulations/israel-regulations/trends-to-look-for-in-2013-a-review-of-the-top-stories-that-affected-israels-nonprofit-sector/#comments Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:37:11 +0000 http://nonprofitbanker.com/?p=3320 Read more →

Recently, Eli Malinsky shared five predictions for the future of Social Entrepreneurship (SE). His first, the title of this post, doesn’t seem to hold true for the Jewish nonprofit sector.

Young SE organizations like PresenTense, Joshua Ventures, Bikurim, ROI etc. have only grown in their acceptance and size.  Recent examples include a Schusterman $250k grant to Ashoka Israel and the Israeli Government’s RFI to create an SE Fund (Hebrew Link). 

The future of Jewish SE lies not on its disappearance as a distinct discipline, but rather in veteran institutions’ willingness to work directly with these newcomers to (hopefully) keep up with the changing times.

Photo courtesy of WiredCanvas (Flickr)

EXPRESSDEPOSIT’s are a new feature to the site, offering 100 WORDS OR LESS on funding, finance, trends, and best practices relating to Israel’s global nonprofit sector.

The following is a “nice” story.  An example of a charity’s CEO showing fiscal responsibility and financial leadership.  It is the kind of story we all-to-often don’t hear about as the media chooses to focus more on misleading reports about the lack of financial know-how in nonprofit organizations rather than on organizations that “get it.”

Recently, I had the pleasure of getting together with the aforementioned strategic CEO for coffee.

Two year ago, this female colleague applied for an Executive Director (ED) position at a particular charity knowing that the organization was facing a 500 thousand shekel (approximately $130 thousand) deficit. After about nine months on the job, the nonprofit was back on track and on the road to a surplus for the following year.

What was this ED’s technique and how could other nonprofits benefit from her experience?  

To put things in perspective, the organization’s budget was 1.5m shekel or $385k. This means that the impending deficit stood at approximately 30% of the charity’s budget. Yikes.

This ED’s financial challenge was twofold:

1. Entering the position at the beginning of the fourth quarter, she first had to make sure the organization finished the year without a deficit.
2. In the slightly longer term, she needed to return the charity to sustainability.

I asked this ED to delineate on some of the key decisions that helped get the organization back on track and that might be of assistance  to nonprofits facing a similar budget crisis:

1) A Deficit Isn’t a Temporary Problem

Credit of any sort is only a band-aid that doesn’t address the source of the budget problem. Budget problems require budget solutions – expenditures must be adjusted for reduced income.   Even meeting next year’s budget does not solve a current year’s cash crunch.  Expenses need to be cut, even if only temporarily.

2) Cutting Staff is Sometimes the Hardest but Quickest Solution

There was no avoiding the fact that more than a third of the 1.5m shekel budget was comprised of salaries. With only four months left until the end of the fiscal year and facing a 500k shekel deficit, drastic action was required. The quickest way to address the organization’s insolvency problem was to reduce the staff, which it did,shrinking to a staff of two from a staff of five.  The hope was that the reduction would be temporary until the charity once again stabilized the budget.

3) Get the Board on Board

The director was quite explicit that she couldn’t have pulled off the recovery by herself; the board of director’s support was critical. The board was very aware of the precarious financial state of the charity and was looking for a CEO that was just as self-aware, willing to make the hard choices.  The board then supported the director 100% during the recovery period.

4) Be Patient When Re-Hiring Staff

The director made the decision to rehire back the staff to their original jobs only after (1) all debts were covered (2) funds for the reinstated budget were promised and (3) there were no cashflow problems in the horizon. (And in case you’re wondering, it has been seven months since the re-hiring and there have been no additional cashflow glitches.)

5) Government Grants Might Be Good for the Budget but are Bad for Cashflow

As of my coffee conversation, this charity had yet to accept any government grants. While secure in their funding (when an organization is accepted, of course), Israeli government grants arrive only after expenditures have been made and can wreak havoc for cashflow (see previous post, Israeli Government Grants: The Broken Promised Land). The CEO made the decision that having a more stable cashflow was better than extra padding for the budget. A serious consideration for charities with budgets below the 2 million shekel mark.

6) Understand the Benefits and Limitations of Funding Sources

To prevent future budget and cashflow problems, this director rethought the organization’s funding sources.  Specifically, in the future to rely more on smaller local (Israeli) funders and less on restricted funds.   While this approach diversified the sheer number of donors, making the organization less in danger should a supporter choose to pull out, the fundraising process was more labor intensive.  On the other hand, a more local approach allowed the organization to consider — and secure — in-kind donations, a source that had yet to be utilized.  It should be noted that the charity is a grassroots organization and this local-donor-approach appealed very much to its inherent character.

7) Prestige Can be Just as Important as Cash

The organization didn’t drop foreign grants altogether.  It was more strategic about whom it approached and secured a very well-known foundation grant.  More important that the money was the prestige associated with getting a grant from this particular foundation.  Simply receiving the grant opened doors with local foundations.  For this charity it was a double-win (money and connections) that made the pursuit of this foreign grant worth the effort.

While the next two items weren’t used to help this organization climb out of the hole, the director did tell me that these tips are critical to helping the charity stay on-track:

8) Create Two Budgets

Hope for the best but plan for the worst, or more accurately, the less-than-best.  The first plan reflects a fully funded budget and the full execution of the nonprofit’s activities.  The second plan reflects more modest expenditure should promised funds not materialize.  Essentially, this director was putting into practice what the Nonprofit Assistance Fund refers to as a Rolling Financial Projection (Paragraph 1.2).

9) Prepare Early

At the time of this meeting in early November, this CEO had more than 70% of the following year’s budget promised.  While this is a tad early, this is certainly the right thinking.  No organization wants to be caught fundraising to cover the current year’s expenses, ideally  not past the first quarter and most definitely not passed the second quarter.  Otherwise, the charity is forced to focus on immediate needs and incapable of developing a more long-term financial strategy.

While there is certainly no one-size-fits-all solution for financial management, these tips certainly strike me as a skeleton key capable of opening most doors.

Tizku Lemitzvot,

Shuey

Disclaimer:  This blog houses my personal opinions and is for informational purposes only — not advice. As charity laws can be quite complex and ever-changing, please refer all questions to qualified and licensed professionals.  Read the full disclaimer.

Photo courtesy of OneCog2Many (Flickr)

In mid-October of this year, Israel’s Registrar of Charities issued “10 Golden Rules for Donors” (Hebrew).  While the document is meant as a guideline for  individuals, it holds immense value for the Israel’s charities, as well.

Here’s why:

Governments equate the tax-deductible rebate on donations to a donation by the government (via the tax authority) to the nonprofit sector as a whole.  In essence, the government views itself as a donor.  Israeli Charities, or amutot, can be sure that Israel’s Rasham Ha’amutot (Registrar of Charities), as an extension of the government, will be heeding its own advice when it vets charities for compliance.

Below are The 10 Golden Rules (in English) and its implications for nonprofits operating in Israel.  

THE 10 GOLDEN RULES FOR DONORS

1) Check the status of the amutah

“Visit the Rasham‘s site (Hebrew) to see if the charity actually exists and it’s current status (current, erased, or in the process of involvement).”

Charities:

The above site lists the charity’s name, status, registered address, and status of Nihul Takin for current and upcoming year. The site also allows people to search by name.

So…

Check the page from time to time to ensure that what appears is accurate; what you see, the donors see.  This is otherwise known as Reputation Management 101.  (More about this in rule #3.)

Additionally, it is advisable to test-search your organization by inputting its partial name or nickname.  This is a great way to observe the competition or help choose a unique name when registering your charity.

2) Confirm that the charity has a Nihul Takin [Certificate of Proper Management]

“The Nihul Takin is a certification issued by the Rasham every year to charities that fulfill the reporting requirements as dictated by the Registrar. Please note that in years when a charity was audited by the Registrar, the Nihul Takin is also a good judge that the organization’s activities are sound. As this is not the case in most years, donors are recommended to carry out their own investigations.”

Charities:

Withholding an organization’s Nihul Takin status is the Registrar’s most powerful and effective tool in its arsenal.   Organizations seeking a government grant or contract must have this status.  Additionally, many foreign funders will also only give to nonprofits that have a Nihul Takin.  (See previous post, Defining an Amutah.)

In simpler terms, having a Nihul Takin lets donors know that an objective third party — in this case  the Registrar and/or its sub-contractors — has reviewed a nonprofit’s activities.

Furthermore, the above website lists the date that the Nihul Takin was granted, meaning that viewers will know if an organization submitted their forms on time or were delinquent.

It is important to note that only charities that have two years of financial reports are eligible for the Nihul Takin.  The above site, however, will not list “not eligible” rather “none.”  Young organizations should proactively warn their constituents so current and potential donors aren’t left wondering why “their” organization is lacking this important certificate.

3) Check the charity on the site Guidestar Israel

“Guidestar Israel contains information from the Rasham [official] and other sources [less official]. The site contains financial and narrative reports, certifications, summaries of activities, and other relevant information on a charity.”

Charities

Moving onto Reputation Management 201.

Has your organization verified that the material listed on Guidestar Israel is accurate and up-to-date?  Organizations can obtain a login password to update and supplement the material that appears on the Guidestar site, including adding text in English.

It is also possible to upload a link to a fundraising site so that impressed individuals can donate directly from Guidestar.  Has your organization availed itself of this function?

Has your organization uploaded its logo for brand recognition?

4) Ask the amutah for details about the purpose and destination of your donation

“Do not hesitate to ask the receiving charity for details or for documentation regarding the intended purpose of the donation. Some of this information can be found in the yearly Narritive Report that the charity submits to the Registrar or in the Board protocols [meeting minutes] pertaining to the charity’s goals for that year.”

Charity:

Does your organization make it easy for donors to navigate its website?  Perhaps, creating a unique “landing” page for the specific drive; don’t make it hard for your donors to find the answers to the questions you know they are asking.

In general, what was considered good practice a few years ago is now the norm. Organizations should expect that would-be funders will conduct their own investigations and act accordingly.

5) When receiving a request for a donation by telephone, clarify before giving

“In the case of receiving a request by telephone, you can certainly ask the caller to either wait or to call back later so that you can properly check the request via the organization’s website or other  means.”

Charities:

Continuing on the previous point: Has your organization equipped its telephone staff with the proper background information to make the ask seem legitimate and answer basic questions?

6) Avoid donating to temporary kupot tzedekah [donation boxes or pushkas]

“It is best to avoid putting donations in these boxes, unless it is in a permanent location or well kept and connected to a organization you know well. Donation boxes are likely targets for theft or fraud. Regardless of familiarity with a particular organization or donation-box locale, it is best never to give large gifts via these pushkas.”

Charities:

The Registrar is essentially telling donors that those nonprofits that have temporary collection plates are not as careful with their funds — or else they wouldn’t collect money in ways susceptible to theft or fraud!

After all, these boxes are not monitored 24/7.  Certainly in today’s day and age, organizations can think of more efficient and safer ways to collect funds.

7) Request a receipt from the recipient for your donation

“A receipt is an essential tool for internal and external monitoring of the integrity of the organization. By law, a charity must offer a receipt for any donation. The receipt should minimally include the name of the amutah, the amutah’s registration number, and amount of the donation.”

Charities:

This is really ABCs of Israel charity management. If your organization isn’t providing receipts for every type of donation, I strongly suggest the manageent of the charity read the Nihul Takin, Israel’s guide for proper management of nonprofits. [Click for Hebrew & English versions of the Nihul Takin.]

8) Plan your donations

“If you donate regularly, once a year, at least, you should plan out your donations. This planning should include the total amount you plan on donation for the upcoming year, including the purposes of said donations so you can come to an informed decision on where you might want to give. If you have personal information about the activities of a favorite charity, or you were and have been pleasantly impressed by this nonprofit’s activities, there is preference for a contribution to this organization after the aforementioned tests have been executed.”

Charities:

Listen up and listen well: Nonprofits that help their donors create such a plan — even one that includes donations to other charities — are providing a much-needed service and proving added value.  Such an organization is engaging and connecting to its donors in a much more intrinsic and personal manner than by simply receiving a check.  This type organization will be remembered by the donor for a long time to come.

On a more basic level, this is why a nonprofit organization must invest in its branding. Does your charity clearly state its goal and how it plans to accomplish said goals? Do you make it easy for donors to understand how you fit into the social-service stratosphere?  Has your organization focused on causation to prove it is worthiness?

9) When necessary, view the charity’s file at the Registrar or request a copy of it on CD

“When necessary you can request to view an organization’s file at the office of the Registrar or to request a CD copy to be mailed to you, for a fee.”

Charities:

There is always a paper-trail.  Almost everything filed is available.  The exceptions are  documents or sections-of-documents that relate to board members or staff on a personal level.  Nuff said.

10) Report an organization’s improper or illegal activity

“If you notice something that seems wrong or illegal about the organization, please contact the offices of the Registrar of Charities by email at: RashamA@justice.gov.il. It is important to note that public inquiries are an integral ingredient used by the Rasham Ha’amutot to monitor the conduct of nonprofits and, thus, to ensure that donations are used for their intended purposes.”

Charities:

Scoff at constituents at your own risk.  Moreover, recent scandals have shown that wrongdoing was first noticed by Friends Of charities, those tasked with financially supporting the organization!

The above point includes staff, as well.  A recent lecture quoted an international report that the primary source of fraud detection in charities are internal tips.

To quote popular culture: you can run but you can’t hide.

I join Israel’s Registrar of Charities in wishing that a smarter donor and a more transparent sector will hopefully lead to greater participation and support of Israel’s charities.

What do you think: Good Rules to Live By or Too Oppressive?

Tizku Lemitzvot,

Shuey

Disclaimer:  This blog houses my personal opinions and is for informational purposes only — not advice. As charity laws can be quite complex and ever-changing, please refer all questions to qualified and licensed professionals. Read the full disclaimer.

Photo: Courtesy of Timo Studios (Flickr)

With such as significant portion of donations to Israel’s charities coming from the United States, changes in American legislation can have a profound impact on Israeli nonprofit organizations.

For this reason, I was excited to co-host (along with Charlie Kalech of J-Town Productions) Laura Solomon, an attorney based in Philadelphia who specializes in nonprofits.   Laura was a powerhouse, leaving me and the other attendees racing to take notes fast enough.

Most revealing was what Ms. Solomon had to say about individual States’ severe rules governing fundraising registration, specifically the broad definition of those required to register and the consequences of failing to do so.    

Below are my notes from the event. Please remember that many of the things mentioned only scratch the surface and proper council should be consulted before acting on anything.

BACKGROUND TO U.S.A. STATE SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS

Nonprofits are subservient to two forms of regulations, Federal and State. While the focus since 9/11 has been more on the Federal level – Patriot Act, Sarbones-Oxley 990 changes, etc – recent rulings in the State level are forcing charities to pay close attention to the additional guidelines (and penalties) emanating from this sphere, as well.

Federal law regulates how organizations use and report funds. In contrast, State law  regulates how funds are raised, which States call Solicitation (and what us normal folk call Fundraising).

As far as States are concerned, Solicitation is anything that leads to a request for a donation or collects data. And yes, organizations are held accountable to this broad definition.  Any solicitation requires registration & annual reporting in the State where the nonprofit is soliciting donors. (Though Laura estimates that only 20% of charities register with the State where they solicit.)

The recent push is a result of the tremendous pressure that States are under – even more than the Federal government – to shrink their vast deficits. Within the States, it is most often than not the Attorney Generals who are spearheading the efforts to examine tax exemptions and compliance by nonprofit organizations.

FILING REQUIREMENTS

40 out of 51 states, including Washington D.C., regulate solicitation of charitable funds.

Laura stressed that the filing requirements can be quite tricky.  Unfortunately, there is no master registration form that applies to all 51 jurisdictions. However, there are instruments that try to ease filing requirements. The Unified Registration Statement (URS) claims to offer one form for 37 participating States. Though, the site notes that even participating States may require supplemental forms.

Ms. Solomon stressed that it is best to ensure that the in-house employee or external firm tasked with organizing the solicitation registration have a propensity for detail, with a law degree being very helpful if not critical.

WHO NEEDS TO REGISTER?

An important point to remember is that even if the charity is using a fiscal agent (a.k.a. intermediary) the benefiting charity still needs to register at the State level. The exception to this would be when a fiscal agent or fiscal sponsor lists the benefiting project in its own filings with the State. In such a case, it could be possible that the benefiting charity would then be exempt from submitting its own paperwork.

Along the same lines, independent solicitors (individuals or companies) that are hired by a nonprofit to fundraise must also register. Failure to do so will affect the recipient charity.

In contrast, grassroots volunteers or community-based (unpaid) “fundraisers”  do not have to register.  However, charities are ultimately responsible for the conduct of the volunteers and must register if volunteers are collecting donations on behalf of the organization. Laura suggested that charities should have a written agreement with their volunteers to create a paper-trail that can prove or deny any official connection / responsibility between the volunteer and the nonprofit.

Most relevant for Israeli charities is the need for foreign nonprofits to register, as well. Much like a fiscal agent, it is also possible that a “Friends of” organization in the States can list it’s Israeli nonprofit  as a benefiting charity, thus, enabling them to avoid registration. Again, please consult with legal counsel to determine if and how this can be done.

CONSEQUENCES OF FAILING TO REGISTER

The fines for noncompliance are pretty steep, with 5 to 10 thousand dollars being the norm. It could very well be that the decision whether or not to register in a particular State might just boil down to simple math: $125 to register vs. $5,000 if fined. But of course, the ultimate decision resides with the charity and its licensed advisers.

Non-registration can have operational side-effects, as well. Laura reported that foundations are starting to require proof of registration when potential recipients apply for grants.

POINTS OF INTEREST

• Most States prohibit fundraisers from receiving a percentage of the money they raise.
• Merely having a website might not be considered Solicitation.  However, a “donate” button can change this perception.
• While slightly out of date, the Charleston Principles listed on NASCONET.org, provides a great working definition of Solicitation.

Do you have experience with State solicitation that you think others can learn from?

Tizku Lemitzvot,

Shuey

Disclaimer:  This blog houses my personal opinions and is for informational purposes only — not advice. As charity laws can be quite complex and ever-changing, please refer all questions to qualified and licensed professionals. Read the full disclaimer.

Photo Credit: “Paperwork” by Curtis Gregory Perry (Flickr)

The word fashla is Hebrew colloquial for “screw-up”. And yes, even your accountant, an Israeli charity’s best friend, can make a few.

As a banker I see this particular slip-up more often than you think. Here are two ways to avoid your accountant inadvertently putting your organization’s bank account in the red. 

PRELUDE

In Israel, the accountant fulfills a crucial role for the amutah [Israeli Charity].

It is your accountant who will point out pitfalls to avoid and best-practices to follow. Assuming you follow your accountant’s advice, s/he will defend your tax-deductible status from less-than-cooperative regulatory bodies. Additionally, many accounting firms also offer bookkeeping services, making them a one-stop-shop for all a charity’s needs.

For these reasons and more, many nonprofits in Israel will leave with their accountant a signed check book so that the s/he can pay relevant bills without having to “bother” the nonprofit.

While efficient in theory — and assuming that an organization is aware of the risks and has obtained the agreement of all relevant stakeholders — there needs to be some ground rules before deciding to put this plan into action.

1. NOTIFY THE NONPROFIT BEFORE ANY PAYMENT

Generally, the accountant’s checkbook is used for payments to Mas Hachnasah [Tax Authority] and/or Bituach Leumi [National Insurance - think Social Security], payments that potentially differ each month and whose computations are done by the accountant. The idea is to take out the middle man — the organization — and just have the accountant pay the relevant government bodies directly. Like I said, efficient.

It can happen that a nonprofit will forget to incorporate the accountant’s checkbook into its cashflow management. The age old saying of “Out of sight, out of mind” comes to mind (no pun intended) when thinking of this scenario.

Letting an organization know of any upcoming payments can avoid these “unexpected” withdrawals. Government payments, in particular, are generally not a last-minute item and can be planned in advance. It probably isn’t a bad idea to have a working agreement regarding minimum “notify” times.

2. TO THINE OWN SELF BE TRUE

The other instance where accountants tend to write their own check is when they…[wait for it]…pay themselves.

Yep.

Similar to the government agencies above, monthly payments to the accountant are not always the same. Additionally, there is the added benefit of convenience for the accountant; after all, the checks are already signed and sitting in his office.

This scenario mimics the first in terms of “Out of sight, out of mind” but has the additional element of Conflict of Interest.

While I wouldn’t say that an accountant who writes him or herself a check without first notifying the client has immediately crossed any red lines, it might be indicative that this s/he isn’t a stickler for details — and a propensity for details is severely required by an accountant.

In addition to a general Conflict of Interest policy for the nonprofit, there should be an prearranged agreement of which beneficiaries will be paid from the accountant’s checkbook and which will be paid from the organization’s checkbook.

CONCLUSION

The ultimate fiscal responsibility lies with the organization. At the same time, accountants are too important to Israeli charities for there to be doubts or misgivings.

The relationship between accountant/bookkeeper and nonprofit organization is as much about expertise as it is about personalities. If these fashlas happen more than just a few times it might be a sign that this accountant is not a good match for the organization (or vice versa).

Tizku Lemitzvot,

Shuey

Disclaimer:  This blog houses my personal opinions and is for informational purposes only — not advice. As charity laws can be quite complex and ever-changing, please refer all questions to qualified and licensed professionals. Read the full disclaimer.

Photo Credit: “Empty Pockets” by Dan Moyle (Flickr)

As was mentioned in my previous post, Israel’s OFFLINE Overhaul of its Nonprofit Sector (Guidestar Conference, Part 1), the June 26th Conference Organized by Guidestar Israel tantalized the attendants with many planned improvements within the government offices tasked with overseeing Isael’s nonprofit sector.

Even more monumental, though, are the changes that are taking place online.  Here we are seeing not only an upgrade in software, but in approach and analysis as well, whose rippling effects will be felt far beyond Israel’s shores.   

AN ONLINE TOOL FOR ISRAELI CHARITIES

Avi Shapira, CEO of NP Tech, the Public Benefit Company that develops and oversees Guidestar Israel and Techsoup Israel, stressed that his organization is aware of Guidestar’s important role in Israel’s nonprofit sector. Evidence of its increasingly crucial role, he said, is seen from the growing number of views of the site from abroad — even though the current version of Guidestar Israel is primarily available in Hebrew.

Shapira believes that Guidestar sits at a unique crossroads because it is a joint project between private and government entities. As such, he wishes that organizations would proactively use Guidestar as a Transparency tool. In this vein, Shapira believes that it is only natural that Guidestar should be the address to aggregate all available Government grants — a feature he believes will be integrated in approximately four months time. (Wow!)

Following up Mr. Shapira, was Benny Shlesinger, of NPTech, who is Guidestar Israel’s project manager. Benny opened that the new site can already be previewed at http://preview.guidestar.org.il.

ROBUST SEARCH FOR THE DONOR

The current site is available in English but only in a limited capacity. The new site, however, will exist in full in English and will incorporate English in its search functions, a feature that will allow international donors to more easily find organizations of interest. Additionally, increased search capabilities will also include the ability to search by organization type, a feature geared for the potential donor with a specific charitable goal in mind but is unaware of the players in that particular field.

In the new site, Shlesinger continued, nonprofits can add even more details to their profile, including links to their social media personalities on the various networks. (Links to donation portals already exist in the current version). This enhanced profile brings with it improved navigation and color designation to make it easier to discern if the information shown originates from certified Government sources or from the charity itself.

STREAMLINED DATA OUTPUT & TIMELIER ANALYSIS

Thanks to recent efforts to bring Israel’s nonprofit online, important data on Israel’s nonprofit sector is available faster than it was in the past.

Additionally, the available data incorporates internationally recognized definitions and categories (see pgs 18-22) to enable the data to be used beyond Israel’s borders, giving the local sector a better understanding of how it fares in the global market and vice versa.

Utilizing this shorter turnaround, Prof. Nisan Limor, Chairman of NP Tech and one of Israel’s leading researchers into its nonprofit sector, presented findings from 2010.

While not the focus of this article, it is interesting to note some of the points that Prof. Limor stressed:

The whole notion of tax-deductible status is very problematic in Israel. The data shows that only 4,280 out of Israel’s approximately 35 thousand charities actually have tax-deductible status, known here in Israel as Sei’f 46a status. Limor pointed out that no other OECD country has charities appealing to parliament to get tax-deductible status. (I shared my own opinions regarding Se’if 46 in a previous piece.)

Tracking “ownership” of nonprofits is still difficult if not impossible. There are invariably charities that are managed by local municipalities, making them extensions of local government and not really charities for the sake of sector analysis. Who these are and how many is very much a mystery.

With all the outcries against “high” salaries in Israel’s nonprofit sector, the numbers show that being a nonprofit manager is no sure ticket to riches. By law, each organization must list its five highest paid employees (assuming they even have five staff members). The average of the five highest paid employees across the entire sector amounts to 8,777 NIS a month, which Limor notes is Israel’s average monthly salary. Even the average of all highest paid employees only amounted to a monthly salary of 12,593 NIS — and all this is before taxes. (No wonder so many directors leave to enter the private sector.) Again, certainly not the point of this piece, but worthy to note.

TAKE-AWAYS FROM THE OFFLINE & ONLINE IMMENENT CHANGES

Both the global and local nonprofit sectors are changing and the word Transparency seems to be an integral part of this metamorphosis.

While it is true that most of points mentioned in the Guidestar-Israel articles are predictions for the future as opposed to hard analysis of the past — and we all know what happens when you “assume” — we should consider ourselves lucky that at last week’s conference the various Government oversight bodies were kind enough to specify the application of Transparency. The exact date these changes will come into effect is of less importance that the fact that they eventually will. Case in Point: Guidestar Israel took six years but did eventually get off the ground.

Israel charities should consider implementing soon the suggestions “offered” at the Guidestar Israel Conference in order to be among the leaders of this change instead of lagging behind.

Tizku Lemitzvot,

Shuey

In case you missed: Israel’s OFFLINE Overhaul of its Nonprofit Sector (Guidestar Conference, Part 1)

Disclaimer: This blog houses my personal opinions and is for informational purposes only — not advice. As charity laws can be quite complex and ever-changing, please refer all questions to qualified and licensed professionals. Read the full disclaimer.

The June 26th Conference Organized by Guidestar Israel — a collaborative project of the Justice Department, Registrar of Corporations, Guidestar International, NP Tech, Joint Distribution Committee (JDC), and Yad Hanadiv (a.k.a. The Rothchild Foundation) — was June’s best prediction for “The Tomorrow of Jewish Philanthropy.”

In the global nonprofit sector there is much talk of cooperation and the need to combine forces to increase efficiency and cut costs, yet this synergy is hard to find. Guidestar Israel, in contrast, is actually doing it. Local charities, international organizations, private funds and government resources have all cooperated to bring the Guidestar Israel project into fruition. (And yes, it took over six years for the parties agree and get things off the ground, but we’ll choose not to focus on that for right now.)

Like many conferences, there was the good and the less good, but for those paid attention, there was also the surprising — announcements foretelling actual progress.

THE SECTOR MUST POLICE ITSELF

Advocate Alon Bachar, Director of Israel’s Corporations Authority, which oversees the Registrar of Charities and the Registrar of Companies, was quick to declare that transparency is the foundation of Israel’s nonprofit sector. Scandals, he continued, harm the sector as a whole. Thus, he concluded – and this is where things got interesting – self interest dictates that the nonprofit sector should police itself. (It would appear from his words that he considers himself and the Government office he represents to be card-carrying members of Israel’s nonprofit sector.)

Furthermore, Bachar blames the local nonprofit sector’s lack of transparency for Israel’s lack-luster standing in philanthropy as compared to other modern countries. This is a bold statement considering other experts have pointed fingers at lax Government tax incentives as the root of the problem or Israeli charities overall lack of strategic engagement with their constituents (my personal belief, which I elaborated in a previous post, “The Real Reason Israelis Don’t Donate to Charity“).

Bachar didn’t leave much to the imagination for those that were looking to understand the criterion upon which the Registrar inspects nonprofits. Bachar stressed that organizations should pay close attention to the Nihul Takin, as it explains “our priorities and how we evaluate charities.”

INFRASTUCTURE CHANGES IN THE REGISTRAR OF CHARITIES

The part of his speech that had the most practical application was Bachar’s announcement that the Registrar of Charities is adding services to increase its own transparency. In the past, Bachar explained, Israeli charities essentially had five addresses within the Registrar of Charities — including accounting, legal, managerial and compliance — where they could address their problems, seek answers, or submit reports. Two years of analysis determined this method to be less than effective and a decision was made to revamp the entire system.

As part of the Registrar’s overhaul, multidisciplinary staffs will be created to combine the five different needs into one address. Instead of five addresses, each charity will be assigned a team that will handle any and all of their requests. Furthermore, this new type of team will allow the Registrar to further specialize its staffs by discipline — whether it be sports, education, welfare, health, environment, religious etc — to better cater to nuance, experience, and trends of the different types of causes.

In a similar vein, Bachar’s Deputy Director, Advocate Avital Shreiber, announced that charities will soon also be labeled by size.  Shreiber acknowledged the difficulty of smaller organizations — many of whom function with no paid staff — to adequately file the multitude of government initiated paperwork.  Much like a system that has existed in the United States for a few years, “smaller” organizations will face scaleddown reports.  Shreiber added that it is even conceivable for their to be specialized reporting for the different philanthropic disciplines.

Transparency, as Bachar defines it for the Registrar of Charities, is uploading information quicker so that it can be utilized in a timelier manner. Toward this end, he said, the Registrar is turning totally digital, with every form and appeal to be handled online. He also announced that the Nihul Takin will be updated soon and would probably only be released on the internet.

USE GUIDESTAR OR ELSE…

Bachar also encouraged amutot to take advantage of Guidestar Israel and upload as much information as possible — even more than is necessary — so as to increase transparency of the organization and the sector as a whole. While some might see this recommendation of Guidestar as mere self-promotion, it should be taken much more seriously considering these two statements:

Bachar’s claim that the Registrar of Charities will be increasing cooperation with various Government agencies, specifically the Tax Authority & Anti Money Laundering Compliance, so as to decrease overlap.

This declaration was preceded by statements from Dr. Guy Rotkopf, CEO of the Justice Ministry which overseas Bachar’s Registrar of Corporations, in which he boldly claimed that Israeli charities that choose not to participate in Guidestar Israel have something to hide.

Definitely hints of trends to come.

Tizku Lemitzvot,

Shuey

Don’t Miss the Next & Final Post in the Series: Israel’s ONLINE Overhaul of its Nonprofit Sector (Guidestar Conference, Part 2)

Disclaimer: This blog houses my personal opinions and is for informational purposes only — not advice. As charity laws can be quite complex and ever-changing, please refer all questions to qualified and licensed professionals. Read the full disclaimer.