I spoke recently at the Kishor conference to Women Professionals on Raising Capital. I really enjoyed the challenge of preparing for the talk as the subject was a business term not often used when working in the nonprofit sector.
When priming the presentation for the expected for-profit audience, I was surprised – though in retrospect I shouldn’t have been – by how much holds true when raising funds for either a nonprofit organization or a for-profit venture.
Moreover, after going over the slides I was amazed how easily I could replace “investor” with “donor” in most of the examples. The fact that the session was attended by professionals from both sectors reinforced this belief.
(The most notable exception to the above is the definition of traction, which is not shared by for-profit and not-for-profit companies.)
Upon further analysis, I was able to gleam three live-or-die principles that span the charitable and capitalist sectors. What follows are my presentation slides and these three takeaways.
CREATE A GOOD BUSINESS
When discussing how to raise capital in his book The Art of the Start, Guy Kawasaki quotes Arthur Rock, founder of Intel:
At a presentation I gave recently, the audience’s questions were all along the same lines: “How do I get in touch with venture capitalists?” “What percentage of the equity do I have to give them?” No one asked me how to build a business!
The success of every social and for-profit venture stems from the above quote — are you building a good business? Questions that can steer a potential entrepreneur to the right path include:
- Are you building something worthwhile?
- Are you providing a worthwhile service? Is your product based on user’s needs or on your own? Are you contributing to making the world a better place?
- If the answer to these questions is yes then the other building blocks must also be in place.
- What is the goal/purpose of the initiative?
- How will success be judged/measured?
- Is there a revenue model in place? (And yes, this is relevant for nonprofits, as well.)
- Have the right people been recruited to bring the project to fruition?
HONESTY TRULY IS THE BEST POLICY
Whether to donors, investors, oversight bodies, or to itself, organizations must maintain and promote honesty. If you still doubt your mother’s advice, here’s another three that might convince you that honesty truly is the best policy:
- People interesting in supporting the project have been around and have heard most of the lies out there. Don’t ever fool yourself into thinking you’ve found a “new” one.
- Never try to cover up lack of experience: all the great companies and entrepreneurs started at zero, just like you.
- By facing the tough questions, organizations can make the brave decisions to evolve and improve.
PURPOSEFUL DECISION MAKING
Ideas are easy to come by, but it’s the implementation that is difficult.
- Purposeful decision making is what gives tangible direction to intangible ideas.
- Additionally, donors, and the even government will have questions about decisions that a corporation has taken. When actions are deliberate, explaining oneself isn’t merely a chore but a chance to convert doubters into evangelists.
- With so many paths to choose — whether in marketing, raising funds, adopting technology, and a million other things – intention and forethought allows us to navigate the myriad of choices available.
Incorporate these three principles and you have the ingredients for making Guy Kawasaki’s words come true:
If you do succeed in building a business, either investors will be fighting to give you money or you won’t need their money. Both are good problems to have.
Tizku Lemitzvot,
Shuey
Photo Credit:”Pile of Money” by Jody Klopp
Thanks for this. I missed your presentation at the conf because my baby needed me. So I’m really glad to see this wrap up. It definitely speaks to me. I just wish I could hear you illustrate your examples. Tizku Limitzvos to you too!
Hi Naomi,
I’m glad you enjoyed the presentation — event though you weren’t there to attend personally.
In what topic were you looking for examples? It’s possible that I can provide links or elaborate further here in the comments section or by email.
I took at your site and found some article that I definitely want to read. Nicely done! (BTW, anyone ever tell you that you look at a lot like MavenMall? It’s uncanny.)
Regards,
Shuey
Hi Shuey,
great post, I like how you did a very good job of summarizing the slideshow in the short post, and the slideshow was short, succinct, and clear enough to enjoy clicking through it too – no short order for sure!
What do you mean by this:
(The most notable exception to the above is the definition of traction, which is not shared by for-profit and not-for-profit companies.)
Hi Gidon,
Thanks for the warm words. I’m glad you found the slides helpful.
Traction is proof that your product has value. It is what entices investors (a.k.a. donors) that they should (continue to) give you money.
For for-profit enterprises, this generally means sales, though other things might be just as convincing.
For charities, the notion of sales isn’t necessarily relevant. Rather I would use other types of benchmarks like impact.
This is a very, very concise definition of traction, but I hope it shows how the two different types of ventures might measure success.
Best,
Shuey